Analysis · 08/24/2026 – 09/13/2026
Top Gainer
MRNA
+190.46%
$60.82 → $176.66
Top Decliner
KPTI
-42.06%
$2.14 → $1.24
Biggest Vol Surprise
MRNA
20.56x
realized move vs. implied
Closed Nearest High
EBS
82.49%
of its range
Closed Nearest Low
AMGN
0.16%
of its range
MRNA dominated the tape, swinging from $60.82 to $176.66 (+190.46%) and closing at $143.97 — 71.75% of its range — with realized volatility of 352.46% against 72.24% implied, a 20.56x vol surprise that stands out as the single largest mispricing in the dataset. EBS (+48.98%) and TEM (+47.84%) also posted outsized ranges, though only EBS held near its highs (82.49% of range); TEM closed at 40.96% and BNTX at just 20.91% despite a 32.84% range, indicating gains were surrendered late.
The decliners cluster tightly at the bottom of their ranges: AMGN (0.16%), LLY (1.09%), ANAB (1.60%), ABT (2.90%), DBVT (3.61%), ADMA (3.78%) and XLV (2.26%) all finished within a few percent of their lows — a broad, synchronized weakness rather than isolated damage. SYK's -19.34% period return alongside a 2.63x realized/implied ratio and ABT's 1.95x show implied vol underpricing moves in large-cap names. Conversely, ANAB (0.55x), ADMA (0.61x), CDXS (0.63x) and DBVT (0.75x) saw options markets overprice volatility that never materialized.
Differential behavior within the sector. The dispersion here is extreme for a single sector: roughly 233 percentage points separate MRNA (+190.46%) from KPTI (-42.06%). That spread is far wider than the sector benchmark's own move — XLV fell only 6.50% top-to-bottom and closed 2.26% off its low with 20.03% realized volatility, the calmest reading in the set. The pattern splits cleanly:
Rotation vs. stock-specific moves. This does not look like a clean defensive rotation *into* healthcare — the sector proxy fell, and the mega-cap defensives led the decline. The more plausible reading is a rotation *out of* large-cap pharma/device ballast paired with aggressive, selective risk-taking in high-beta biotech. MRNA's 20.56x vol surprise is the signature of a single-name catalyst, not a macro repricing; the same applies to EBS, TEM and KPTI, whose moves were far too large and too divergent to share a common driver.
Plausible sector-relevant drivers. The behavior is consistent with several live themes, though none can be confirmed from this data alone:
The recurring theme: implied volatility systematically underpriced large-cap moves (SYK 2.63x, AMGN 2.11x, ABT 1.95x) while overpricing the micro-caps — a positioning asymmetry worth noting.
AI-generated analysis grounded in the data from this report. Informational only, not investment advice.