Blue Sky Stock Volatility Report

Analysis · 08/03/2026 – 08/20/2026

Generated August 20, 2026 04:01 PM · 24 symbols · claude-opus-5

Top Gainer

SNDK

+83.13%

$998.19 → $1827.99

Top Decliner

WDC

-29.75%

$580.00 → $407.48

Biggest Vol Surprise

AMZN

7.37x

realized move vs. implied

Closed Nearest High

TSLA

88.31%

of its range

Closed Nearest Low

CSCO

2.26%

of its range

Notable Movers & Volatility

The dispersion here is extreme and heavily concentrated in memory/storage. SNDK led at +83.13% ($998.19 → $1827.99), with SKHY (+42.97%), MU (+40.42%) and STX (+35.64%) alongside it, while WDC ran the other way at -29.75% ($580.00 → $407.48) on 107.99% realized vol — the same complex trading in opposite directions, which is unusual and argues for name-specific rather than purely sector-wide positioning.

Implied vol under-priced the realized move almost everywhere. The starkest gaps were in megacaps where options were cheapest: AMZN at 7.37x (28.55% implied vs. 60.22% realized), MSFT at 6.56x (25.95% vs. 59.26%) and AAPL at 5.75x (24.83% vs. 42.94%). Only NVDA (1.71x) and NTAP (1.86x) saw realized fall meaningfully short of implied.

Range closes split the tape: TSLA finished at 88.31% of its range and MU at 79.07%, versus CSCO at 2.26%, AVGO at 8.83%, GOOGL at 19.20% and META at 24.31% — strength held in some AI-adjacent names while networking and parts of megacap tech faded into the lows.

Broader Market Context

The pattern above — violent single-name dispersion, cheap index-level implied vol badly under-pricing realized moves — is consistent with a market re-rating the *cost curve* of AI rather than uniformly de-rating it.

What the data plausibly reflects:

Macro overlay: realized-over-implied ratios of 4–7x in low-beta megacaps typically accompany unresolved rate and inflation paths. Renewed energy-price or geopolitical risk premia would likely pressure both the inflation outlook and the long-duration discounting that AI capex stories depend on. Hedges priced off recent implieds appear to have been too cheap; sizing for continued gap risk seems prudent.

AI-generated analysis grounded in the data from this report. Informational only, not investment advice.